Gel with wide distribution of Mw in mid-block

ABSTRACT

A wide Mw gel that includes an A-B-A triblock copolymer with the copolymer having a molecular weight distributed across a range rather than centered about a single data point.

PRIORITY

Priority is hereby claimed to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/650,737 filed on Feb. 2, 2005.

FIELD

The subject matter hereof relates to gelatinous elastomer materials, and the molecules from which they are made.

BACKGROUND

Much work has been done in the field of gelatinous elastomers. U.S. Pat. No. 5,994,450 by inventor Tony M. Pearce, which is hereby incorporated by reference, discloses gelatinous elastomers (“gel”) made from a plasticizer or plasticizing fluid, such as mineral oil, and an A-B-A triblock copolymer, such as styrene-ethylene-ethylene-styrene (SEEPS). The copolymer is plasticized so that at least some of the plasticizer associates with the mid block B. An alternative A-B-A triblock copolymer is styrene-ethylene-butadiene-styrene (SEBS) as taught in U.S. Pat. No. 4,369,284 by John Y. Chen, which is hereby incorporated by reference. Most makers of gelatinous elastomer materials and articles today express a strong preference for gels made with SEEPS rather than SEBS due to superior strength and elongation, reduced oil bleed, and other desirable material properties.

SEBS polymers are made by a number of suppliers, including SEPTON Company of America in Pasadena, Tex. as well as its parent company, Kuraray in Japan. SEBS polymers are also available from Kraton Polymers, Inc. of Houston, Tex. and from. However, SEEPS polymers are made only by one supplier, SEPTON Company of America in Pasadena, Tex., and its parent company in Japan. Thus it would be advantageous to have a SEBS polymer that had, in comparison to SEEPS, similar or better strength and elasticity properties, similar or better non-bleed properties, and similar or better other properties, in a gel.

Ordinarily, makers of this A-B-A tri-block copolymer strive to have a narrow range of molecular weight in a given polymer. Then, they offer a number of different polymers, each with its own range of molecular weights. If a user desires to have some of the properties of two or more different molecular weights, the user would mix two or more polymers together. However, in my use of such mixing, I have not found that the resultant gel is desirable.

For example, I have mixed Septon 4055 (a high Mw polymer) with Septon 4044 (a medium Mw polymer) and Septon 4033 (a low Mw polymer), then heat-blended these together with mineral oil and cooled the mixture into a cohesive gel. This would be considered a trimodal gel because the molecular weights of the polymers are centered around 3 different points. While the resultant gel is easier to fill into molds because of its lower melt viscosity, the structural properties of the resultant mixed-polymer gel have been inferior to gels made with Septon 4055 alone (a unimodal gel). I believe that the low Mw polymers reach their maximum elongation before the medium and high Mw polymers, and fail before the other polymers become strained, thus drastically reducing tensile strength and elongation at failure of the gel. Therefore I concluded that merely mixing various molecular weights of SEEPS triblock copolymers did not yield a desirable gel.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

I have discovered that a gel made by combining the mineral oil with a single SEBS polymer wherein at least the EB block of the molecules have a particular range or distribution of molecular weights forms an advantageous gel with properties that match or nearly match a gel made with SEEPS having a molecular weight of 300,000 or more (Septon 4055 and mineral oil may be used to achieve such a gel). One such polymer is that of Kraton Polymers, Inc. called KW-1000. For convenience, I will hereafter refer to gels made by mixing such polymers with a range of Mw within the same polymer with mineral oil as ‘wide Mw gels’. As use herein, wide Mw gels have a generally even distribution of molecular weights across a particular spectrum, rather than having substantial peaks at certain molecular weights (as in the trimodal gel above).

In doing my experiments, I found that there are other significant advantages to wide Mw gels in addition to finding an SEBS polymer that rivaled SEEPS in performance in gels. The first significant advantage is that the wide Mw gels process at a much lower temperature than traditional SEEPS or SEBS gels. For example, a 3:1 oil:SEBS (KW-1000) gel processes in an extruder at about 250 degrees F. A 3:1 oil:Septon-4055 SEEPS gel would process at about 350 F. This extra 100 degrees F. is undesirable because it can cause significant oxidative degradation during processing, particularly in batch processing. The second significant advantage is that even at the lower processing temperature, the wide Mw gel made has a considerably lower melt viscosity. I do not have the equipment to measure melt viscosity quantitatively, but the 3:1 molten SEEPS gel at 350 F. is not suitable for pour-casting into fine-detail molds, whereas the molten wider Mw gel can be easily pour-cast into a fine-detail mold at much less than 350 F.

For use herein, a wide Mw gel can be any gel using an A-B-A triblock copolymer where the molecular weight of at least the B block is distributed across a range rather than being centered around a particular molecular weight. For example, Septon 4055 is an A-B-A triblock copolymer of the SEEPS configuration with a molecular weight centered around 300,000 molecular weight. Kraton G1651 is an A-B-A triblock copolymer of the SEBS configuration with a molecular weight centered around 200,000. Neither of these falls within the scope of a wide Mw gel because the molecular weight of the copolymer is centered about a single data point.

Examples of wide Mw gels are as follow:

Copoplymer Range of Mw Percent of Mw within this range

-   -   SEBS 100,000 to 250,000 80%     -   SEBS 150,000 to 225,000 90%     -   SEBS 200,000 to 260,000 75%     -   SEBS 200,000 to 225,000 65%     -   SEEPS 160,000 to 300,000 85%     -   SEEPS 150,000 to 400,000 95%

For any one of these wide Mw gels, if any particular data point is chosen, such as a molecular weight of the copolymer of 250,000, not more than about 50% of the copolymers match that data point. In some embodiments, more than 50% of the copolymer will fall within the stated molecular weight range, in some embodiments more than 60%, in some embodiments more than 70%, in some embodiments more than 80%, in some embodiments more than 90%. Molecular weights for an SEBS copolymer are expected to be within the range of 100,000 to 300,000, or within the range of 125,000 to 275,000, or within the range of 150,000 to 250,000 or within the range of 200,000 to 275,000, or within the range of 200,000 to 250,000, or within the range of 200,000 to 225,000, or otherwise.

To date my testing does not show significant disadvantages to the wide Mw gel in comparison to traditional SEEPS gels when used at room temperature. Traditional SEEPS gels will have an advantage in retaining shape at high temperatures, such as in the trunk of a car in Arizona in the summertime. Traditional SEEPS gels also appear to be somewhat stronger in tensile strength, though both gels are exceptionally strong for a soft elastomer. Both gels in, for example, a 4:1 oil:polymer ratio do not bleed oil, though in both cases oil can be forced out through capillary attraction if the gel is placed for several hours next to a wicking source such as paper. When against fabric, such as a cushion cover, no bleed occurs. In a test where a 0.5 inches×0.7 inches piece of wide Mw SEBS gel in an 8:1 oil:polymer ratio was put on a piece of regular photocopy paper overnight, the oil had been wicked sufficiently to leave a stain 0.25 inches out from the edges of the KW-1000 sample, and 0.45 inches out from the SEEPS gel sample. Lower oil:polymer ratios showed the stain as similar between the two gels. This shows a measurable advantage of the wide Mw gel over traditional SEEPS gels in oil retention in high oil:polymer ratios. Both gels appear to be less tacky than most prior art gels, and less tacky than the traditional SEBS gel. The wide Mw gel does appear to have higher tensile strength than traditional SEBS gels. Both gels are very resistant to compression set at room temperature, and if overstressed are able to recover or largely recover from compression set, and both gels (traditional SEEPS gel and wide Mw gel) are better in this regard than most prior art gels. In summary, while traditional SEEPS gels may have a slight edge in final properties, the wide Mw gels are very close in performance and are much better than other prior art, while at the same time processing at lower temperatures and/or at lower melt viscosities.

Because the wide Mw gels can be processed at lower temperatures and/or at lower melt viscosities, they can more easily be incorporated with microspheres that have a polymer shell. Heretofore gels with properties as good or nearly as good as traditional SEEPS gels and containing polymer microspheres, especially those with lower oil:polymer ratios (as a non-limiting example 2.5:1) could not be molded under pressure into molds, and pressure is generally required for finer-detail molds or longer-flow-distance molds. This is because the melt temperature must be high and the molding pressure must be high, either one of which can serve to destroy (‘pop’) the polymer-shell microsphere. Example of such microspheres include acrylic microspheres such as are made by Matsumoto of Japan and Expancel of Sweden. Even glass and other non-polymer microspheres often pop under the high pressure required to mold quality gels such as traditional SEEPS gels. Microspheres can offer several advantages to gels, including without limitation lower density of the gel, lower heat/cold transfer, lower oil bleed or oil wick-out, improved throughput in a melt blending screw (for example an extruder screw) and a silky feel with less friction.

All the gel components mentioned in U.S. Pat. No. 5,994,450 (which is hereby incorporated by reference) can be used in various combinations in the wide Mw gels hereof. Additives to the gel can be used in greater quantities in the wide Mw gels because of the lower processing temperature and melt viscosity. For examples without limitation, flame retardants, antioxidants, colorants, anti-bleed additives (such as Zonyl-BAN), extenders, fillers, and reinforcers. As an example of an improvement, less antioxidant needs to be used. As another example of an improvement, the colorants used will not lose their color as much as at higher temperatures.

Another aspect of the wide Mw gels is the combining of wider Mw gels with any other type of copolymer in which an elastomer mid-block or end-block or other block is combined in the polymer with polystyrene. The polystyrenes of the wider Mw gel will combine with the polystyrene of the other type of copolymer to give a blend of the properties of wider Mw gel alone and a gel made with that other copolymer. In general, it is anticipated that the wider Mw copolymer will improve the structural properties as compared with a gel made with oil and that other copolymer alone, while the other copolymer will impart a desired property to the blend which is inherent to that other copolymer. A particular embodiment as described in this paragraph is the combining of wider Mw gels with SEEPS polymers such as Septon 4055 or Septon 4077. This mixed polymer can offer lower melt viscosity and lower processing temperature than traditional SEEPS gels, while giving more heat stability than wider Mw gels alone. Since both the wider Mw SEBS of this disclosure and SEEPS have styrene end caps, they will combine to make a polymer with these advantages.

While the present invention has been described and illustrated in conjunction with a number of specific embodiments, those skilled in the art will appreciate that variations and modifications may be made without departing from the principles of the invention as herein illustrated, described, and claimed. The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects as only illustrative, and not restrictive. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope. 

1. A wide Mw gelatinous elastomer comprising: a quantity of SEBS triblock copolymer, a quantity of a plasticizer, said triblock copolymer and said plasticizer being mixed to form a gelatinous elastomer, said glelatinous elastomer being a wide Mw gel, said wide Mw gel having at least 80% of its copolymer molecules being distributed between a molecular weight of 150,000 and 250,000, and said wide Mw gel having less than 50% of its copolymer molecules centered about any particular molecular weight.
 2. A gel as recited in claim 1 wherein said wide Mw gel has a lower melt viscosity than a gel composed of the same ratio of SEBS and plasticizer with the SEBS being centered around a single molecular weight and of about the same overall molecular weight as the copolymer in the wide Mw gel.
 3. A gel as recited in claim 1 wherein said wide Mw gel has a lower processing temperature than a gel composed of the same ratio of SEBS and plasticizer with the SEBS being centered around a single molecular weight and of about the same overall molecular weight as the the copolymer in the wide Mw gel.
 4. A gel as recited in claim 1 further comprising microspheres.
 5. A wide Mw gelatinous elastomer comprising: a quantity of triblock copolymer, a quantity of a plasticizer, said triblock copolymer and said plasticizer being mixed to form a gelatinous elastomer, said glelatinous elastomer being a wide Mw gel, said wide Mw gel having at least 80% of its copolymer molecules being distributed between a molecular weight of 100,000 and 400,000, and said wide Mw gel having less than 50% of its copolymer molecules centered about any particular molecular weight.
 6. A gel as recited in claim 5 wherein said wide Mw gel has a lower melt viscosity than a gel composed of the same ratio of SEBS and plasticizer with the SEBS being centered around a single molecular weight and of about the same overall molecular weight as the the copolymer in the wide Mw gel.
 7. A gel as recited in claim 5 wherein said wide Mw gel has a lower processing temperature than a gel composed of the same ratio of SEBS and plasticizer with the SEBS being centered around a single molecular weight and of about the same overall molecular weight as the copolymer in the wide Mw gel.
 8. A wide Mw gelatinous elastomer comprising: a quantity of SEBS triblock copolymer, a quantity of a plasticizer, said triblock copolymer and said plasticizer being mixed to form a gelatinous elastomer, said glelatinous elastomer being a wide Mw gel, said wide Mw gel having a majority of its copolymer molecules being distributed between a fist molecular weight and a second molecular weight, wherein said first molecular weight is less than said second molecular weight, and wherein said distribution of copolymer molecules is a generally even distribution without a peak around a particular molecular weight, and said wide Mw gel having less than 50% of its copolymer molecules centered about any particular molecular weight.
 9. A gel as recited in claim 8 wherein said wide Mw gel has a lower melt viscosity than a gel composed of the same ratio of SEBS and plasticizer with the SEBS being centered around a single molecular weight and of about the same overall molecular weight as the copolymer in the wide Mw gel.
 10. A gel as recited in claim 8 wherein said wide Mw gel has a lower processing temperature than a gel composed of the same ratio of SEBS and plasticizer with the SEBS being centered around a single molecular weight and of about the same overall molecular weight as the copolymer in the wide Mw gel.
 11. A gel as recited in claim 8 further comprising microspheres. 